Ford Museum Health Care Presentation 4-11-12

Picture

Highly Informative

Last night I attended the Ford Museum presentation Health Care: What We Want, What We Need & What We Can Afford. The presenters, who expressed “opposing” views, and the moderator, were all very knowledgeable well credentialed people. The program was very interesting and informative, as you would expect. Of course it centered on the Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act (PPACA) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act) and associated Supreme Court legal process. As background they discussed the history of how we got to this point; a long torturous route. Each side quoted surveys and analysis that supported their point of view.

Ever the less, it was of value to hear both sides presenting their case with more than just sound bites. I of course believe the presenter that supported my views had the most valid arguments. However, the other presenter did get me thinking about some of the other side’s position. So that is a good thing. 


Picture
The Audience

But perhaps the most interesting part of the program resulted from the audience questions and the related responses. If I could sum up what I thought I heard was that folks want the issue of health care cost and services to be fixed. One presenter said surveys showed that most individual elements of PPACA are very popular and will likely be more respected once we get to 2014 when most elements “kick in”.  This assumes it will still be constitutional. But the general impression is this is not good for the country as it stands. However, they feel that the real culprits in this process are the politicians. They have done a lousy job, special interests seem to be first consideration, and they are playing political games, rather than really trying to solve the problem.


Picture
The Take Away

Each fix to the health care situation adds another layer of complexity, because we are not good at the  issue of transition and we have the wrong priorities. The fix should be patients first, cost management second, institutions last and war after health.  Applauds from the audience seem to support this strategy.


4/13/2012 03:58:28 am

Good program - although the "What We Can Afford" discussion did not lead to any concise conclusions. I do agree with one point that was made, What We Can Afford, in actuality, is what we are willing to pay. A significant contributor to the cost of health care can be attributed to the fact that many of the uninsured population is uninsured largely by choice - insurance (especially in Michigan) is available to all residents. However, having other financial priorities, paying off debt, paying for schooling, driving a nice car (or two), taking nice vacations (name your vice here) etc. does not leave much room in many family budgets for insurance premiums. While opposing family needs/desires are truely difficult to manage cost effectively, the hospital ER being open 24/7 allows everyone, regardless of ability to pay, full access to health care services.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Ardon Schambers has 39 years of professional HR experience and is a Principal of P3HR Consulting & Services, LLC

    Mike Blake has over 15 years of safety and leadership experience in industry with extensive transportation expertise.

    Jim Kohmescher worked in both the private and public sectors in human resource management positions. He has a Master's degree and served as an adjunct college instructor.

    Archives

    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Visit Website www.p3hrcs.com